Skip to main content

Data

We used data from the sources listed below:

1. Ballotpedia.

  1. Endorsements by Donald Trump. https://ballotpedia.org/ Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump [accessed 26 March 2021].
  2. U.S. Senate battlegrounds, 2018. https://ballotpedia.org/U.S._Senate_battlegrounds,_2018 [accessed 31 May 2021].
  3. U.S. Senate battlegrounds, 2020. https://ballotpedia.org/U.S._Senate_battlegrounds,_2020 [accessed 31 May 2021].

2. Polling Report. Pollingreport.us – public opinion online. http://www.pollingreport.us [accessed 23 May 2020].

Deviation of polls from the election outcome over time

trumpist fig4Figure 4: Republican two-party poll support minus Republican two-party election vote share over time by endorsement, incumbency, and battleground state. Positive values indicate an overestimation, negative an underestimation of the actual vote share.

Model specification

Table 1 reports the priors and hyperpriors for the models we describe in the main text. Priors are chosen which allow up to 5% bias (0.2 on the logit scale) and variance (0.05 on the log scale).

Table 1: Definition of priors and hyperpriors.

trumpist tab1

Results: Average election day bias

Figures 5 and 6 report the average election-level election day bias for different models:

trumpist fig5

Figure 5: Estimated average election-level bias on election day of the endorsement and incumbency model. Negative values indicate that polls on average underestimated election results. Thicker horizontal lines represent the 50% credible intervals, and thinner lines the 95% credible intervals. Note that due to absence of polling data, not all states are shown.

trumpist fig6

Figure 6: Estimated average election-level bias on election day of the endorsement and battleground model. Negative values indicate that polls on average underestimated election results. Thicker horizontal lines represent the 50% credible intervals, and thinner lines the 95% credible intervals. Note that due to absence of polling data, not all states are shown.

Results: Mean posterior estimates of election-level poll deviation from the election outcome, election day bias and standard deviation

Table 2 reports mean posterior estimates of the average absolute election-level deviation from the election outcome, the average absolute election-level bias on election day, the average election-level total standard error and the average election-level standard error. Standard deviations are given in parentheses.

Table 2: Mean posterior estimates of average absolute election-level errors.

trumpist tab2


About the authors

Sina Chen is a PhD candidate at the Graduate School of the Social and Behavioural Sciences at the University of Konstanz.

John Körtner is a PhD candidate at the Swiss Graduate School of Public Administration (IDHEAP) at the University of Lausanne.


Editor’s note

See the June 2022 issue of Significance for Chen and Körtner’s article: https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/17409713/2022/19/3

Privacy Overview
Significance magazine

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies are required to save your preferences for cookie settings

Analytics Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.